Legis Daily

NORRA of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-1526| House 
| Updated: 4/10/2025
Darrell Issa

Darrell Issa

Republican Representative

California

Cosponsors (14)
Clay Higgins (Republican)Lance Gooden (Republican)Keith Self (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Derek Schmidt (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)Nicholas A. Langworthy (Republican)Derrick Van Orden (Republican)John J. McGuire (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Mark Harris (Republican)Nick LaLota (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Judiciary Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The "No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025" aims to significantly restrict the authority of United States district courts to issue broad injunctive relief. Under this bill, district courts would generally be prohibited from issuing injunctions that apply beyond the specific parties involved in a case and those they represent in a representative capacity, effectively targeting so-called "nationwide" injunctions. However, an important exception is created for cases where two or more states from different judicial circuits challenge an action by the executive branch. Such cases would be referred to a randomly selected three-judge panel , which would have the authority to issue broader injunctive relief. This panel must consider the interest of justice, the risk of irreparable harm to non-parties, and the preservation of the constitutional separation of powers when making its decision. Appeals from these three-judge panel decisions can be made either to the relevant circuit court or directly to the Supreme Court, at the preference of the appealing party.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
4 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Feb 24, 2025
Introduced in House
Feb 24, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.
Mar 5, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Mar 25, 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
Mar 25, 2025
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.
Apr 1, 2025
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.
Apr 7, 2025
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Apr 8, 2025
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1482: 1; text: CR H1482: 1)
Apr 8, 2025
Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Apr 8, 2025
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1526.
Apr 8, 2025
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Apr 8, 2025
The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 1526 are postponed.
Apr 9, 2025
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H.R. 1526.
Apr 9, 2025
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1550-1552)
Apr 9, 2025
Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)
Apr 9, 2025
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
Apr 9, 2025
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 217 (Roll no. 97).
View Vote
Apr 10, 2025
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
View Vote
Apr 10, 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Apr 10, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  • February 24, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • February 24, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • March 5, 2025
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.


  • March 5, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • March 25, 2025
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.


  • March 25, 2025
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.


  • April 1, 2025
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.


  • April 7, 2025
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.


  • April 8, 2025
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1482: 1; text: CR H1482: 1)


  • April 8, 2025
    Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.


  • April 8, 2025
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1526.


  • April 8, 2025
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.


  • April 8, 2025
    The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 1526 are postponed.


  • April 9, 2025
    Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H.R. 1526.


  • April 9, 2025
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1550-1552)


  • April 9, 2025
    Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)


  • April 9, 2025
    The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.


  • April 9, 2025
    On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 217 (Roll no. 97).
    View Vote


  • April 10, 2025
    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
    View Vote


  • April 10, 2025
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.


  • April 10, 2025
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Law

Related Bills

  • HRES 119-294: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
  • HRES 119-282: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
  • S 116-2464: Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act of 2019
  • S 118-4095: SHOP Act
Federal district courtsJudicial procedure and administration

NORRA of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-1526| House 
| Updated: 4/10/2025
The "No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025" aims to significantly restrict the authority of United States district courts to issue broad injunctive relief. Under this bill, district courts would generally be prohibited from issuing injunctions that apply beyond the specific parties involved in a case and those they represent in a representative capacity, effectively targeting so-called "nationwide" injunctions. However, an important exception is created for cases where two or more states from different judicial circuits challenge an action by the executive branch. Such cases would be referred to a randomly selected three-judge panel , which would have the authority to issue broader injunctive relief. This panel must consider the interest of justice, the risk of irreparable harm to non-parties, and the preservation of the constitutional separation of powers when making its decision. Appeals from these three-judge panel decisions can be made either to the relevant circuit court or directly to the Supreme Court, at the preference of the appealing party.

Bill Text Versions

View Text
4 versions available

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Feb 24, 2025
Introduced in House
Feb 24, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Mar 5, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.
Mar 5, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Mar 25, 2025
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
Mar 25, 2025
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.
Apr 1, 2025
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.
Apr 7, 2025
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Apr 8, 2025
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1482: 1; text: CR H1482: 1)
Apr 8, 2025
Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
Apr 8, 2025
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1526.
Apr 8, 2025
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Apr 8, 2025
The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 1526 are postponed.
Apr 9, 2025
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H.R. 1526.
Apr 9, 2025
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1550-1552)
Apr 9, 2025
Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)
Apr 9, 2025
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
Apr 9, 2025
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 217 (Roll no. 97).
View Vote
Apr 10, 2025
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
View Vote
Apr 10, 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Apr 10, 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  • February 24, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • February 24, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


  • March 5, 2025
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.


  • March 5, 2025
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held


  • March 25, 2025
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 27.


  • March 25, 2025
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.


  • April 1, 2025
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.


  • April 7, 2025
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.


  • April 8, 2025
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 294. (consideration: CR H1482: 1; text: CR H1482: 1)


  • April 8, 2025
    Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.


  • April 8, 2025
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1526.


  • April 8, 2025
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.


  • April 8, 2025
    The Chair announced that pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 1526 are postponed.


  • April 9, 2025
    Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed consideration of H.R. 1526.


  • April 9, 2025
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1550-1552)


  • April 9, 2025
    Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)


  • April 9, 2025
    The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.


  • April 9, 2025
    On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 217 (Roll no. 97).
    View Vote


  • April 10, 2025
    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
    View Vote


  • April 10, 2025
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.


  • April 10, 2025
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Darrell Issa

Darrell Issa

Republican Representative

California

Cosponsors (14)
Clay Higgins (Republican)Lance Gooden (Republican)Keith Self (Republican)Claudia Tenney (Republican)Derek Schmidt (Republican)Anna Paulina Luna (Republican)Daniel Meuser (Republican)Nicholas A. Langworthy (Republican)Derrick Van Orden (Republican)John J. McGuire (Republican)Randy K. Sr. Weber (Republican)Mark Harris (Republican)Nick LaLota (Republican)Brian Babin (Republican)

Judiciary Committee, Judiciary Committee

Law

Related Bills

  • HRES 119-294: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
  • HRES 119-282: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
  • S 116-2464: Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act of 2019
  • S 118-4095: SHOP Act
  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Federal district courtsJudicial procedure and administration