Legis Daily

SMK Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-6257| House 
| Updated: 12/11/2025
Neal P. Dunn

Neal P. Dunn

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (1)
Donald G. Davis (Democratic)

Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, Energy and Commerce Committee

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
The Safe Messaging for Kids Act of 2025 seeks to safeguard minors, defined as individuals under 17, from potential harms associated with certain social media features. It specifically targets ephemeral messaging and unsolicited direct contact on platforms where the provider knows or should know the user is a minor. The bill defines a "social media platform" broadly to include services enabling user profiles, network connections, and user-generated content sharing with integral interpersonal communication. A core provision of the Act is the outright prohibition of ephemeral messaging features for covered users. These features, which automatically delete messages after a set time, once viewed, or upon exiting a chat, are deemed inaccessible to minors. This aims to prevent content from disappearing before parents or guardians can intervene if necessary. Furthermore, the bill mandates that social media platforms provide easily accessible and usable parental direct messaging controls for minors. Parents must be able to activate and manage these controls through verifiable parental consent, with clear explanations of their operation. These controls must be prominently displayed to parents and users creating profiles for likely minors. The required parental controls include several key functionalities. Parents must receive timely notifications for direct messaging requests from unapproved contacts , allowing them to approve or deny the request before communication begins. They can also view and manage a list of approved contacts, be informed if their child changes their age on a profile, and have the ability to disable any direct messaging feature entirely. For covered users under 13, direct messaging features must be disabled by default, though parents can provide consent to enable them. The Act also requires app stores to provide clear warnings to parents when a minor attempts to download an app with direct messaging features, provided the parent has set up such a requirement. Enforcement of these provisions falls under the purview of the Federal Trade Commission , treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts or practices. State Attorneys General are also empowered to bring civil actions on behalf of their residents. Importantly, the bill includes strong rules of construction regarding encryption, stating that nothing in the Act requires social media providers to weaken, decrypt, or impair any form of encryption, including end-to-end encryption. The Act must be implemented in a manner that respects user privacy and security, and does not encourage systemic surveillance. Additionally, the Act's provisions preempt any conflicting state or local laws.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Nov 21, 2025
Introduced in House
Nov 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Nov 21, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
Dec 11, 2025
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Dec 11, 2025
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • November 21, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • November 21, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.


  • November 21, 2025
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.


  • December 11, 2025
    Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.


  • December 11, 2025
    Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Commerce

Child safety and welfareComputers and information technologyComputer security and identity theftConsumer affairsFamily relationshipsFederal preemptionIntergovernmental relationsInternet, web applications, social mediaProduct safety and qualityRight of privacyState and local government operationsTelephone and wireless communication

SMK Act of 2025

USA119th CongressHR-6257| House 
| Updated: 12/11/2025
The Safe Messaging for Kids Act of 2025 seeks to safeguard minors, defined as individuals under 17, from potential harms associated with certain social media features. It specifically targets ephemeral messaging and unsolicited direct contact on platforms where the provider knows or should know the user is a minor. The bill defines a "social media platform" broadly to include services enabling user profiles, network connections, and user-generated content sharing with integral interpersonal communication. A core provision of the Act is the outright prohibition of ephemeral messaging features for covered users. These features, which automatically delete messages after a set time, once viewed, or upon exiting a chat, are deemed inaccessible to minors. This aims to prevent content from disappearing before parents or guardians can intervene if necessary. Furthermore, the bill mandates that social media platforms provide easily accessible and usable parental direct messaging controls for minors. Parents must be able to activate and manage these controls through verifiable parental consent, with clear explanations of their operation. These controls must be prominently displayed to parents and users creating profiles for likely minors. The required parental controls include several key functionalities. Parents must receive timely notifications for direct messaging requests from unapproved contacts , allowing them to approve or deny the request before communication begins. They can also view and manage a list of approved contacts, be informed if their child changes their age on a profile, and have the ability to disable any direct messaging feature entirely. For covered users under 13, direct messaging features must be disabled by default, though parents can provide consent to enable them. The Act also requires app stores to provide clear warnings to parents when a minor attempts to download an app with direct messaging features, provided the parent has set up such a requirement. Enforcement of these provisions falls under the purview of the Federal Trade Commission , treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts or practices. State Attorneys General are also empowered to bring civil actions on behalf of their residents. Importantly, the bill includes strong rules of construction regarding encryption, stating that nothing in the Act requires social media providers to weaken, decrypt, or impair any form of encryption, including end-to-end encryption. The Act must be implemented in a manner that respects user privacy and security, and does not encourage systemic surveillance. Additionally, the Act's provisions preempt any conflicting state or local laws.
View Full Text

Suggested Questions

Get AI-generated questions to help you understand this bill better

Timeline
Nov 21, 2025
Introduced in House
Nov 21, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Nov 21, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
Dec 11, 2025
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Dec 11, 2025
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  • November 21, 2025
    Introduced in House


  • November 21, 2025
    Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.


  • November 21, 2025
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.


  • December 11, 2025
    Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.


  • December 11, 2025
    Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Neal P. Dunn

Neal P. Dunn

Republican Representative

Florida

Cosponsors (1)
Donald G. Davis (Democratic)

Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee, Energy and Commerce Committee

Commerce

  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor
  • Passed Chamber
  • Enacted
Child safety and welfareComputers and information technologyComputer security and identity theftConsumer affairsFamily relationshipsFederal preemptionIntergovernmental relationsInternet, web applications, social mediaProduct safety and qualityRight of privacyState and local government operationsTelephone and wireless communication